Wednesday , October 5 2022

Major universities go to war with the Morrison government to reduce their research


According to Vice-Chancellor of Sydney University Michael Spens, universities will have to study the results of research.

"Together with the collection of funds for domestic student resources, today's announcement will not allow thousands of future students, including remote and regional regions, in leading Australian universities, including the University of Sydney," he said.

In spite of the fact that Australian research investment has diminished, this funding opportunity allows many universities to explore, but to explore Australia's most important problems, including those that benefit directly from rural areas. "

Vice-Premier of the University of Monhar Margaret Gardner said that the decision to finance was "foolish" and would lead to research, funding for the university, and accumulation of student resources.

"It's actually going to kill thousands of people," she told Fairfax Media.

"Each of them talks, but when you add them together, you influence the budget, which will have a great impact on the quality of education that we can support.

"This was an attack on university research, which is really unnecessary and may have a general adverse effect on the research."

According to the vice-chancellor of the OIC, Brian Schmidt, the university has supported eight statements.

Vice rectors tell about the planned "national interest test" for the research grants issued through the Australian Research Council. On Sunday, Fairfax Media said that Australia would hinder the projects that harming US security, foreign policy, and strategic interests.

Other irritants include the free expression of the campus and the plan of forced evacuation of Den Taean, the Minister of Education, to pay for the security of the students, and the planning of paying for a college student loan.

The G8 group called it "a net tax" as a "cost recovery". The bill, which was introduced in September, has yet to pass through parliament.

Minister of Education Dan Teehan has protected the changes.

Minister of Education Dan Teehan has protected the changes. Credit:Alex Ellinghausen

Mr. Tean defended the government's decision to release government research funds as "a small redistribution of $ 17 billion in the budget of higher education." He said that he would help regional students to empower their students like their capital counterparts.

Most money is invested in Queensland's major polls, including James Cook University and the University of Sunshine Coast, releasing them from freezing last year.

But even regional vice-rectors have found that money has been disassociated from research funding if they benefit from a $ 134 million cash injection.


Scott Bowman, head of the Central Queensland University, said in an interview with Fairfax Media that he "had a very strong impact" [and] It's a pity to hear that money comes from other parts of the university system. "

Professor Bowman said that he was "grateful" for additional money, but in reality we still need to make money.

The debates on academic research were dropped on the evidence of former Mr. Simon Birmingham, allowing ministers to veto the 11 art and humanitarian projects proposed by the government for approval. The minister used such powers for the first time in a decade.

On Monday, Mrs. Thomson blamed the government for the value of academic research.

In an interview with Phthofax Media, he said: "Scientific research has a reasonable impact on national interests and values.

"It can not be used to study the financing of taxpayers in higher education institutions. We need transparency and we will do it, "he said.

Michael Cozyol – Journalist on Immigration and Legal Affairs for the Age of Youth, located in the morning herald and home of parliament

Source link