Friday , August 19 2022

Chinese scientist shocked the scientific world with genetically modified first-born babies


The Chinese scientist, who claimed to have created the first genetically modified baby in the world, was proud of his work on Wednesday and that he was safe and ethical. Many other scientists are skeptical and the organizers of the forum called their actions irresponsible.

"Especially in this case I'm proud of it""said Professor Jen Jiany at the International Conference on Genetic Modification in Hong Kong, before his colleagues, who presented his experiences with DNA alterations in two twins and could not infect AIDS.

According to her, now genetically modified embryos have the ability to store other pregnancies.

The only thing she apologized for was using the genetic engineering technology of CRISPR to change the embryos, and then this month, she brought two twin girls into her womb.

The science adventure statement has so far not been independently confirmed, the BBC said. Many scholars have condemned Jiangxi, and some have turned their ideas into a tragedy. Scientists are trying to prevent people from using such advanced technologies to change DNA.

In many countries, such research is forbidden.

Hong Kong scientists, including first-class genetics, are often mistreated by the behavior of Jiangxi. They point out that there are important issues that the embryo does not yet have to do with the 'editing' security, so it should be done in an open and controlled way to avoid using the technology strictly.

Professor did not calm his colleagues on Wednesday.

Nobel Peace Prize laureate David Baltimore, immediately after his release, was chairman of the organizing committee of the conference. He was unresponsive, writes The New York Times.

"I do not think it's an open process and I do not think it's a medical need," she says, "until it's after childbirth," says Bertemoor.

Professor of Genetics and Embryology, Frank L. Cricket Institute in London, Robin Lovell-Bege Hai asked why Jiangziang needed such a secret, especially in the scientific community's view, that it still does not work.

At present, you are accused of breaking the law. If you ask the Chinese authorities, you may say that you can not do it, "said Lovell-Bege.

He said that University of South University of Science and Technology in Shenzhen is not familiar with his research project and will conduct an investigation.

He said he did not know his university and financed the experiment at his own expense.

According to her, newborn twins, called "Lulu" and "Nana," were "healthy and healthy" and said they intend to monitor their development in 18 years.

He reminded Jiangsu that eight couples agreed to voluntarily participate in the experiment from HIV-positive fathers and HIV-negative mothers. Then the professor chooses one of these pairs.

She also writes that her scientific work is for scientific journals, she has been awarded for evaluation and evaluation, but she did not say what the publication was.

The application of the Genetic Engineering Technology CRISPR is not a novelty for the scientific world. It was first discovered in 2012. It uses "molecular scissors" to try to change the DNA's unique flow – cut it or replace it or fix it.

Genetic processing helps prevent inherited diseases by removing or modifying the problem code in the embryo.

However, experts warn that the genome of the embryo may be harmful not only to the individual but also to future generations who inherit those adjustments.

Hundreds of Chinese scholars wrote in their social media, "they are" ordinary "against the professor's actions.

Professor Julian Severlescu, of Oxford University, told the BBC earlier: "If this is true, this experiment is very emotional and genetic modification itself is experimental and it is still associated with fluctuations in the mutation, can cause genetic problems at the beginning or later, in the development of cancerous diseases. "

"This experiment creates a healthy risk of genital mutilation for healthy children," he says.

In many countries, including the United Kingdom, there are numerous laws that prohibit genetic transformation of embryos in humans.

Scientists can make such studies about fetal fertilization embryos and should not be used to destroy them immediately and to make newborns.

Source link