Thursday , August 18 2022

Another genetically-processed thing can be on the track, says the scientist


A Chinese researcher who claimed to have created the first genetically modified baby in the world said he would not allow the second pregnancy.

The researcher found that Jiangxi in Shenzhen was pregnant when he published his first public opinion on his controversial work at an international conference on Wednesday in Hong Kong.

He claims that the twins born early this month were trying to resist the DNA infection by the AIDS virus. Leading scientists have accused the experiment, universities and government groups.

The second pregnancy is at an early stage and should be monitored for a long time as it lasts, "he said.

Leading researchers say that it's more than just answering, and now it's raising more questions. The conference manager has proved that the experiment is "irresponsible" and that the scientific community has not been settled to prevent early efforts to alter the DNA.

Before or after the DNA formulation, it is very controversial that changes can be inherited and may damage other genes. It is prohibited in some countries, including the United States, except for laboratory tests.

She insisted that gene editorialism could not be a hereditary genital mutilation test, and that HIV could protect her choice and benefit girls.

"They need protection because there are no vaccines," he said.

Scientists did not buy it.

Jennifer Dodna of California-Berkeley University and one of the inventors of the CRISPR gene-editor, says: "This is really an adverse development. "I am grateful to have appeared today, but I have not heard the answers. We must understand that it is still valid. "

Harvard Extract Institute and MIT David Lee have developed a genetic editorial version. "It's not a powerful technology that has a huge potential for the company, and that's a tough example. I hope this will never happen again. "

It has no independent confirmation of its requirements and has not yet been published in any of the scientific journals that experts have seen. At the conference, he refused or denied answers to many questions, including who paid for his work, how the participants understood the potential risks and benefits, and why he kept it secret after its creation.

According to David Baltimore, Nobel Prize laureate at the California Institute of Technology and conference, his work will be "irresponsible," as many scholars say does not meet the criteria agreed a few years ago. gene processing. should be taken into consideration

"I do not think it's necessary medical care. Choosing the disease that has been heard during today's discussion is far more complicated than "trying to stop HIV infection," he said.

If genetic treatment is permitted, many scientists are designed to treat and prevent significant inherited disorders, such as cellular anemia and Huntington's disease. HIV is not a good candidate because there is a safe way of preventing transmission, and if contracted, it is controlled by medications, "researchers say.

"The scientific community was not self-regulated," said Baltimore, who said Thursday that the Conference Committee would make a statement on the prospect of the field.

Dean of Harvard Medical School George Daley and one of the organizers of the conference, Jason Daeily, refused to reproduce Gene's experiments based on editing. The first thing to do is to think that "I do not think we should put our head on the sand and do not consider very positive aspects," Deley said. .

"Unscientific scientists … have a great impact on the scientific community," says Daley.

According to one of the organizers of the conference, the Royal Society said Thursday that it was planned to hold a postponement of the embryonic gene shortly after the interview.

Regulatory authorities accuse the experiment of being ethical and non-scientific.

The National Health Commission instructed local officials in the Guangdong province to investigate their activities, and its employer is South China University of Science and Technology.

On Tuesday, Tsu Renjun of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences was criticized for allowing him to speak at a conference and said that independent experts should not be "on our agenda" before re-examining it. It is not clear that the laws of reproductive medicine in China are infringed; Qui says he did, but said, "The problem is that there is no penalty."

The US National Health Institute (UI) said they had to have international intervention on Wednesday.

"Without such restrictions, the world is facing the threat of endangering both ethical and unethical projects," the statement said.

In addition, American scientists said they had been in contact with them and knew or suspected what they were doing.

Stanford University genetics doctor Matthew Pole, said he would try to edit human genes in February after conducting a doctoral research. According to Porest, he said that he was "weak". "It can be an offense to blame irresponsible, it can offend all the genes.

Dr. William Harowbut, a Stanford etiologist, said that over the last two years, he had talked about gene editing.

"I knew his first works. I knew where I was going, "Hurlbut said, four or five weeks ago, when she saw her, she did not say she was pregnant with pregnant embryos, but" I waited for her, "Hurlbut said.

"I disagree with the idea of ​​the consensus of the scientific community," Hurlbut said. If science is not sufficiently prepared or safe, it "creates inaccuracies, disagreements and mistrust".

Jennifer Dodna and David Lee will be paid by the Heavens Hewes Medical Institute and will also support the Department of Health and Science.

Source link